So Harry comments:
There is good reason to believe that the ruling elites favor a cull. I think they've given up on trying to solve things rationally and wish we would all just go away.After reading his comment, I wanted to run around the room in circles, pulling on my hair, yelling, “Noooo, I don't want to go there. It's too weird and crazy. It's too complicated. It is too nefarious.”
I am aware of the depopulation agenda, and have been dancing around the subject here for sometime. So many of us are addicted to what someone other than themselves have defined as “reasonable”. The evidence shows that the power elite are not so limited, and this handy mind virus has kept us all in the dark and made us easily exploitable. In fact, keep digging, and it begins to appear that what has been defined as reasonable was created by these elite to cloak their dark, occult agenda.
Usually, I prefer to stick to the more philosophical, rather than the specific. Plenty of sites deliver specifics of the conspiratorial nature of our reality. Not so many detail how we played a part in allowing psychopathic control freaks conspire against life loving humans. I think it may be due to our lack of understanding of the fundamental nature of reality.
We embraced others useless and harmful synaptic structures; we were never aware that there are more options in life rather than the usual binary choices provided. That there are those who are orientated toward creativity and those orientated toward entropy, and it is up to each of us as individuals to consciously choose which end of the scale we want to work toward. Perhaps the default is entropy. It sure looks that way now, doesn't it? It is always easier to destroy rather than to create.
We all have some responsibility in allowing the predators to overwhelm the ecosystem, and they plan on consuming everything. Lies work because we want to believe them. Our reality is a brutal and ugly one full of torture, mutilation and rape. Those of us who have managed to avoid the worst of it, and overlook the aspects we haven't can not seem to stare reality in the face without flinching.
A few caveats: If you like so called “smoking gun” evidence, than that could be construed as a character flaw. You probably won't find it delving into the murky underworld of crimes against nature committed by the elite. You can only assign probabilities. Most of the time research can only turn up the outward manifestations of these crimes, and the true nature and extent has to be extrapolated.
The mass media has infiltrated our mind and subconscious far more than we like to admit. The term conspiracy theory and those that write about such things have images defined in our minds by the mass media. These images have helped cover up many a crime, or so I think.
Obsession is bad. You see it often enough in NWO websites, or in the likes of certain conspiracy researchers like Icke or Cooper. It is easy to become fixated on one aspect, or to react in horror and begin an outrageous course of action. Or worse yet, fall for a false lead injected into your environment, as in Icke's case. I think it is better to just focus on seeing. A fine tuned observer has an effect on the environment in non-linear ways I think.
Before studying conspiracy, it is helpful to understand how COINTELPRO or PsyOp works. There are so many smoke screens, blinds, double, and triple reverse psychological tricks that it takes a long time and a lot of research to understand the flavor of such activities and to easily spot them. And even then, it is probably not a good to idea to say case closed.
Often there are screens or crimes that are leaked to the public and everyone is lead down the merry garden path and much talk is generated that leads no where. It is all rather discouraging.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.- Dwight D. Eisenhower, Farewell Address to the Nation, January 17, 1961It was already too late by the time someone got around to publicly declaring such potentiality. Such talk soon grew dim in a public awareness that is easily distracted by updated vaudeville acts and quick to work toward treasurers in the after life. Most had little knowledge to place such a statement in context anyway.
There may be one over arching conspiracy that could possibly be gleaned from myths. A code left by our ancestors to warn us. Maybe.
The bad guys think they are the good guys. The bad guys aren't always following the same agenda, but often assassinate each other and work at cross purposes. We are all the bad guys unless we choose otherwise, and are aware enough to not fall for what ever bill of goods “they” try to sell us. Ignorance and prejudice are not good excuses. Ego seems to get us in trouble. I have seen it often enough, as someone identifies with some piece of research and can't see further or open up to different possibilities.
Some playing this depopulation card think they are trying to save the earth. Many are big in the new age/occult shenanigans, and have played extensive roles in establishing new religions. Control and destruction are their means to achieve their ends. It is all they know. Some would consider themselves environmentalists.
There is one small problem with their agenda, and it may be their downfall. It is the ultimate in hubris to think that one can control any aspect of the universe, or so I think.
I will disagree slightly with Harry, or rather seek to clarify. It is not that they are tired of us or that this mysterious elite ever sought to solve anything rationally. This elite creates the problem and then offers the solution. Their so called “solutions” continually increases their control.
9/11 is an excellent example of their tactics. The attacks, which an increasing body of evidence shows required inside help, and was not a bunch of terrorists organized from a remote cave, are being used to create perpetual war. More problems, and more “solutions”. More terrorist attacks and less freedom.
After all these caveats, I guess it is time to edge toward the specific. This will require delving into high strangeness. Let's get something straight - The elite are FREAKS.
I will begin with the pseudo science of eugenics, which contrary to the average belief system, began in the US, not in Germany:
Eugenics and the Nazis -- the California connectionThis will have to be another series. In the meantime, I recommend checking out the rest of the above article.
San Francisco Chronicle
Sunday, November 9, 2003
[T]he concept of a white, blond-haired, blue-eyed master Nordic race didn't originate with Hitler. The idea was created in the United States, and cultivated in California, decades before Hitler came to power. California eugenicists played an important, although little-known, role in the American eugenics movement's campaign for ethnic cleansing.
Eugenics was the pseudoscience aimed at “improving” the human race. In its extreme, racist form, this meant wiping away all human beings deemed “unfit,” preserving only those who conformed to a Nordic stereotype. Elements of the philosophy were enshrined as national policy by forced sterilization and segregation laws, as well as marriage restrictions, enacted in 27 states. In 1909, California became the third state to adopt such laws. Ultimately, eugenics practitioners coercively sterilized some 60,000 Americans, barred the marriage of thousands, forcibly segregated thousands in “colonies,” and persecuted untold numbers in ways we are just learning. Before World War II, nearly half of coercive sterilizations were done in California, and even after the war, the state accounted for a third of all such surgeries.
California was considered an epicenter of the American eugenics movement. During the 20th century's first decades, California's eugenicists included potent but little-known race scientists, such as Army venereal disease specialist Dr. Paul Popenoe, citrus magnate Paul Gosney, Sacramento banker Charles Goethe, as well as members of the California state Board of Charities and Corrections and the University of California Board of Regents.
Eugenics would have been so much bizarre parlor talk had it not been for extensive financing by corporate philanthropies, specifically the Carnegie Institution, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Harriman railroad fortune. They were all in league with some of America's most respected scientists from such prestigious universities as Stanford, Yale, Harvard and Princeton. These academicians espoused race theory and race science, and then faked and twisted data to serve eugenics' racist aims. [...]